<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Weak Law of Attraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/11/30/the-weak-law-of-attraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/11/30/the-weak-law-of-attraction/</link>
	<description>Epistemology in the New Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:35:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilad</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/11/30/the-weak-law-of-attraction/comment-page-1/#comment-12556</link>
		<dc:creator>gilad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/?p=164#comment-12556</guid>
		<description>Fascinating!

I’ve read all your posts so far. Very interesting. I’m dealing with these subjects as well, from somewhat different angle, and it was enlightening to read somebody else’s thoughts about the same topics.

I find some truly original thoughts in what you write, beyond many that I’ve read in all kind of “skeptical” books and sites, at a deeper level.

So, what is your “explanation” for the weak law of attraction? I’m curious.

And why did you stop writing? Please post some more thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating!</p>
<p>I’ve read all your posts so far. Very interesting. I’m dealing with these subjects as well, from somewhat different angle, and it was enlightening to read somebody else’s thoughts about the same&nbsp;topics.</p>
<p>I find some truly original thoughts in what you write, beyond many that I’ve read in all kind of “skeptical” books and sites, at a deeper&nbsp;level.</p>
<p>So, what is your “explanation” for the weak law of attraction? I’m&nbsp;curious.</p>
<p>And why did you stop writing? Please post some more&nbsp;thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/11/30/the-weak-law-of-attraction/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/?p=164#comment-234</guid>
		<description>I always had a problem with it being called a &quot;law&quot;, which would imply that it is a constant that has been determined through empirical research. It hasn&#039;t been. Maybe it&#039;s like that saying &quot;perception is reality&quot;; people associate their perception to the degree that it&#039;s all they need to alter in order to get what they want, neverminding actions and behaviors? But also, there is something to be said about the removal of responsibility. It&#039;s easy to have a consistent positive thought process, but then associate someone else&#039;s ill thoughts of you as &quot;attracting&quot; bad events in your life. However, regardless of the bad events happening as a result of your negative thoughts or someone else&#039;s, this sets people up for thinking themselves the victim each time something bad happens. This hardly seems like a healthy or realistic philosophy in which to live your life. Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always had a problem with it being called a &#8220;law&#8221;, which would imply that it is a constant that has been determined through empirical research. It hasn&#8217;t been. Maybe it&#8217;s like that saying &#8220;perception is reality&#8221;; people associate their perception to the degree that it&#8217;s all they need to alter in order to get what they want, neverminding actions and behaviors? But also, there is something to be said about the removal of responsibility. It&#8217;s easy to have a consistent positive thought process, but then associate someone else&#8217;s ill thoughts of you as &#8220;attracting&#8221; bad events in your life. However, regardless of the bad events happening as a result of your negative thoughts or someone else&#8217;s, this sets people up for thinking themselves the victim each time something bad happens. This hardly seems like a healthy or realistic philosophy in which to live your life. Great&nbsp;post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

