<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strong Law of Attraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/10/28/the-strong-law-of-attraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/10/28/the-strong-law-of-attraction/</link>
	<description>Epistemology in the New Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 16:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/10/28/the-strong-law-of-attraction/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/?p=162#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>@ OP Author:

I&#039;d think defenders of LOA would find some way out of this loophole, like &quot;but belief only presents itself in the power to transform facts, not automatic transformation of facts,&quot; or some other BS. My question is, what if different people totally believe in two different powers, but the two powers existing simultaneously is a logical contradiction? (Unstoppable force and unmovable object.) Then we&#039;d get heavy on the semantics, conditions, exceptions, et cetera.

@ Art&#039;s Musings: It&#039;s obvious you didn&#039;t mull this post over much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ OP&nbsp;Author:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d think defenders of LOA would find some way out of this loophole, like &#8220;but belief only presents itself in the power to transform facts, not automatic transformation of facts,&#8221; or some other BS. My question is, what if different people totally believe in two different powers, but the two powers existing simultaneously is a logical contradiction? (Unstoppable force and unmovable object.) Then we&#8217;d get heavy on the semantics, conditions, exceptions, et&nbsp;cetera.</p>
<p>@ Art&#8217;s Musings: It&#8217;s obvious you didn&#8217;t mull this post over&nbsp;much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art's Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/2008/10/28/the-strong-law-of-attraction/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Art's Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticaloccultism.com/?p=162#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Intelligent, introspective and thought-provoking!

You&#039;ve approached the Law of Attraction from an analytical point of view.  Interesting in that there are many of us that do exactly that.  Does that hinder our success?  Does it keep us grounded?  

What if it &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt; as simple as just manifesting what our predominant thoughts are?  I believe it is.

You&#039;ve opened up another point of reference.  I&#039;m looking forward to your follow up post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligent, introspective and&nbsp;thought-provoking!</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve approached the Law of Attraction from an analytical point of view.  Interesting in that there are many of us that do exactly that.  Does that hinder our success?  Does it keep us&nbsp;grounded?  </p>
<p>What if it <i>were</i> as simple as just manifesting what our predominant thoughts are?  I believe it&nbsp;is.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve opened up another point of reference.  I&#8217;m looking forward to your follow up&nbsp;post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
